Impact of SGLT2 inhibitors and real clinical practice

Authors: Branislav Vohnout 1,2,3;  Jana Lisičanová 3;  Andrea Havranová 4
Authors‘ workplace: Ústav výživy, Fakulta ošetrovateľstva a zdravotníckych odborných štúdií a Koordinačné centrum pre familiárne hyperlipoproteinémie, Slovenská zdravotnícka univerzita v Bratislave 1;  Ústav epidemiológie LF UK, Bratislava 2;  Diabetologická ambulancia Diabeda, Bratislava 3;  Ústav klinického a translačného výskumu, Biomedicínske centrum Slovenskej akadémie vied, Bratislava 4
Published in: AtheroRev 2020; 5(3): 158-161
Category: Reviews


Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the primary cause of death in diabetes patients. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a newly identified class of drugs that in addition to glucose lowering effect have shown cardiovascular protective effects and even reduction of all-cause mortality. RWE studies that reflect common clinical practice have confirmed the effect from clinical trials. Possible mechanism of the cardioprotective effect are discussed.


cardiovascular disease – real-world evidence – SGLT2 inhibitor

  1. Informace dostupné z WWW: <>.
  2. Defronzo RA. Banting Lecture. From the triumvirate to the ominous octet: a new paradigm for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 2009; 58(4): 773–795. Dostupné z DOI: <–9028>.
  3. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, prediabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J 2020 J; 41(2): 255–323. Dostupné z DOI: <>.
  4. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis 2019; 290: 140–205. Dostupné z DOI: <>.
  5. Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR et al. [Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration]. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet 2010; 375(9733): 2215–2222. Dostupné z DOI: <–6736(10)60484–9>.
  6. Ghezzi C, Lo o DDF, Wright EM. Physiology of renal glucose handling via SGLT1, SGLT2 and GLUT2. Diabetologia 2018; 61(10): 2087–2097. Dostupné z DOI: <–018–4656–5>.
  7. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM et al. [EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators]. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373(22): 2117–2128. Dostupné z DOI: <>.
  8. Wanner C, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM et al. Empagliflozin and Progression of Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016; 375(4): 323–334. Dostupné z DOI: <>.
  9. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW et al. [CANVAS Program Collaborative Group]. Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017; 377(7): 644–657. Dostupné z DOI: <>.
  10. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP et al. DECLARE–TIMI 58 Investigators. Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019; 380(4): 347–357. Dostupné z DOI: <>.
  11. Zelniker TA, Wiviott SD, Raz I, Im K et al. Comparison of the Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Circulation 2019; 139(17): 2022–2031. Dostupné z DOI: <>.
  12. Patorno E, Najafzadeh M, Pawar A et al. The EMPagliflozin compaRative effectIveness and SafEty (EMPRISE) study programme: Design and exposure accrual for an evaluation of empagliflozin in routine clinical care. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab 2019; 3(1): e00103. Dostupné z DOI: <>.
  13. Patorno E, Pawar A, Franklin JM et al. Empagliflozin and the Risk of Heart Failure Hospitalization in Routine Clinical Care. Circulation 2019; 139(25): 2822–2830. Dostupné z DOI: <>.
  14. Patorno E, Pawar A, Bessette LG et al. Effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin in routine care patients: interim results from the EMPagliflozin compaRative effectIveness and SafEty (EMPRISE) study. Diabetes 2020; 69(Suppl 1): 134-LB. Dostupné z DOI: <–134-LB>.
  15. Schneeweis S, Pawar A, Franklin JM et al. The risk of heart failure hospitalisation among routine care patients initiating empagliflozin vs glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a substudy from EMPRISE. EASD 2019; Abstract 687.
  16. Patorno E, Pawar A, Franklin J et al. Cardiovascular Effectiveness of Empagliflozin Compared to DPP4 Inhibitors and to GLP1 Receptor Agonists: Interim Analysis from the Empagliflozin Comparative Effectiveness and Safety (EMPRISE) Study. AHA 2019 Scientific Session. Oral presentation. Circulation 2019; 140(Suppl 1): A11928.
  17. Patorno E, Goldfine AB, Schneeweiss S et al. Cardiovascular outcomes associated with canagliflozin versus other non-gliflozin antidiabetic drugs: population based cohort study. BMJ 2018; 360: k119. Dostupné z DOI: <>.
  18. Pasternak B, Ueda P, Eliasson B et al. Use of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and risk of major cardiovascular events and heart failure: Scandinavian register based cohort study. BMJ 2019; 366: l4772. Dostupné z DOI: <>.
  19. Patorno E, Pawar A, Bessette LG et al. Cardiovascular outcomes in older adults initiating Empagliflozin vs. DPP4 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor agonists: a subgroup analysis from the EMPRISE study. Diabetes 2020; 69(Suppl 1): 133-LB. Dostupné z DOI: <–133-LB>.
  20. Vallon V, Thomson SC. Targeting renal glucose reabsorption to treat hyperglycaemia: the pleiotropic effects of SGLT2 inhibition. Diabetologia 2017; 60(2): 215–225. Dostupné z DOI: <–016–4157–3>.
  21. Verma S, McMurray JJV. SGLT2 inhibitors and mechanisms of cardiovascular benefit: a state-of-the art review. Diabetologia 2018; 61(10): 2108–2117. Dostupné z DOI: <–018–4670–7>.
  22. Das SR, Everett BM, Birtcher KK et al. 2020 Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Novel Therapies for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76(9): 1117–1145. Dostupné z DOI: <>.
  23. Dardano A, Miccoli R, Bianchi C et al. Invited review. Series: Implications of the recent CVOTs in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020; 162: 108112. Dostupné z DOI: <>.
Angiology Diabetology Internal medicine Cardiology General practitioner for adults

Article was published in

Athero Review

Issue 3

2020 Issue 3

Most read in this issue
Forgotten password

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.


Don‘t have an account?  Create new account